Contrastive Analysis Of Arabic And Uzbek Syntactic Structures: Implications For Translation Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-4-0245Keywords:
contrastive analysis, Arabic syntax, Uzbek syntax, translation pedagogy, word order, syntactic transfer, VSO, SOV, idafa, agreement systemsAbstract
This study presents a systematic contrastive analysis of syntactic structures in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and Modern Literary Uzbek Received: 15-05-2026 (MLU), with particular attention to the implications of structural divergences for translation pedagogy. Arabic and Uzbek belong to fundamentally different Accepted: 28-05-2026 language families–Semitic and Turkic respectively–and exhibit typologically Published:09-06-2026 contrasting syntactic patterns in word order, agreement systems, relative clause formation, and nominal modification. Despite the historical and cultural connections between Arabic and Uzbek through the Islamic scholarly tradition, systematic contrastive linguistic analysis of the two languages remains underdeveloped. Employing a parallel corpus of 600 sentence pairs drawn from Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. literary, journalistic, and academic texts, this study identifies and classifies Submitted for open access publication the principal syntactic divergences between Arabic and Uzbek, analyzes the under the terms and conditions of the translation challenges arising from each divergence, and proposes pedagogical Creative Commons Attribution (CC strategies for addressing these challenges in Arabic-Uzbek translation training BY) license programs. Results reveal that word order asymmetry (VSO/SVO in Arabic vs. SOV (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ in Uzbek) constitutes the most pervasive source of translation difficulty, followed by/4.0/) by the Arabic system of grammatical agreement (gender, number, case), relative clause structures, and the idafa (construct state) construction. The study identifies five categories of syntactic transfer errors in student translations and proposes a contrastive-based pedagogical framework for systematic error prevention. The findings carry direct implications for the methodology of Arabic translation instruction in Central Asian universities.References
1. Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315619187
2. Blachère, R., & Gaudefroy-Demombynes, M. (1975). Grammaire de l’arabe classique (3rd ed.). Maisonneuve et Larose.
3. Eker, S. (2006). Contrastive analysis of Arabic and Turkish syntax. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı, 54, 41–98.
4. Hasanov, B. (2019). Arab-o’zbek badiiy tarjima muammolari [Problems of Arabic–Uzbek literary translation]. Sharqshunoslik, (2), 18–38.
5. James, C. (1980). Contrastive analysis. Longman.
6. Johanson, L., & Csato, É. Á. (Eds.). (1998). The Turkic languages. Routledge.
7. Kharma, N. N., & Hajjaj, A. H. (1989). Errors in English among Arabic speakers. Longman. 221 E-ISSN:3070-8370 Journal of Social and Theological Studies
8. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. University of Michigan Press.
9. Menges, K. H. (1995). The Turkic languages and peoples (2nd ed.). Harrassowitz.
10. Rahimov, A. (2020). Talabalarning arab-o’zbek tarjimalarida uchraydigan xatolar tahlili [Analysis of errors in student Arabic–Uzbek translations]. Tilshunoslik, (3), 52–68.
11. Versteegh, K. (2014). The Arabic language (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press. 222 E-ISSN:3070-8370
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shahribonu RAHIMOVA (##default.groups.name.author##)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.