Статьи · Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026)

Challenges In Ensuring Religious Tolerance In Malaysia

Authors

  • Anvar MUSTAFOYEV

Keywords

Malaysia religious tolerance religious freedom Islam (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Constitution Sharia courts civil courts apostasy religious conversion religious by/4.0/) minorities religious equality religious discrimination Lina Joy case Bumiputera policy social cohesion

Abstract

This article examines the major political, legal, and social challenges to ensuring religious tolerance in Malaysia. It analyzes the constitutional position of Islam as the religion of the Federation, the guarantees of religious freedom, and the coexistence of civil and Sharia courts as key factors Received: 15-05-2026 shaping the country’s policy of religious tolerance. The study also discusses Accepted: 28-05-2026 issues related to apostasy, religious conversion, the rights of religious minorities, Published:09-06-2026 restrictions on the construction and registration of places of worship, and unequal approaches to religious propagation. Particular attention is given to the impact of these challenges on social cohesion, equality, and citizens’ religious rights, including the Lina Joy case as a significant example of the legal limits of religious Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. freedom in Malaysia. The findings demonstrate that the institutional supremacy Submitted for open access publication of Islam and the dual legal system create substantial obstacles to achieving under the terms and conditions of the genuine religious equality and tolerance in Malaysia. Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license

References

1. Abdullah, N., & Li Hua, C. (2007). Legislating Faith in Malaysia. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 264–289.

2. Adil, M. A. M. (2007). Law of Apostasy and Freedom of Religion in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 2, 1–36.

3. Aminnuddin, N. A. (2020). Ethnic differences and predictors of racial and religious discriminations among Malaysian Malays and Chinese. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1766737.

4. BBC News. (2021, March 11). Malaysia High Court rules Christians can use ‘Allah’. https://www. bbc.com/news/world-asia-56356212

5. Buang, A. H. (2007). Islamic Contracts in a Secular Court Setting? Lessons from Malaysia. Arab Law Quarterly, 21(4), 317–340.

6. Choong, J. (2020, January 16). G25: Apostasy a major sin, but Constitution provides freedom of worship for Muslims too https://malaysia.news.yahoo.com/g25-apostasy-major-sin- constitution-104238518.html 308 E-ISSN:3070-8370 Vol. 1, (Issue 4/2026)

7. Choong, P. Y. (2021, March 26). The Allah controversy in Malaysia: More than semantics. Fulcrum. https://fulcrum.sg/the-allah-controversy-in-malaysia-more-than-semantics/

8. David, M. K., & Yoong, D. (2011). Islamic activism anti-apostasy propaganda in the Lina Joy case. The Indian Journal of Social Work, 72(2), 199–222.

9. Fernando, J. M. (2006). The Position of Islam in the Constitution of Malaysia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 37(2), 249–266.

10. Malaysia – Freedom of Thought Report | HUMANISTS INTERNATIONAL https://fot.humanists. international/countries/asia-south-eastern-asia/malaysia/#Apostasy

11. Masilamany, J. (2025, March 24). Kuala Lumpur: Tensions between Muslims and Hindus over the ‘transfer’ of an ancient temple. AsiaNews. https://www.asianews.it/news-en/Kuala- Lumpur:-Tensions-between-Muslims-and-Hindus-over-the-transfer%E2%80%99-of-an-ancient- temple-62745.html

12. Means, G. P. (1978). Public Policy Toward Religion in Malaysia. Pacific Affairs, 51(3), 384–405.

13. Musa, R., Ali, M. S., Mat, K. A., Jusoh, W. H. W., & Razali, K. (2024). Examining the social implications of apostasy punishment in Islamic scholarly discourse: A case study of its application in Malaysia. Nanotechnology Perceptions, 20(S13), 1755–1767.

14. NEO, J. L.-C. (2006). Malay Nationalism, Islamic Supremacy and the Constitutional Bargain in the Multi-ethnic Composition of Malaysia. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 13(1), pp. 95–118.

15. Peletz, M. G. (2002). Reinscribing Authenticity and Identity. In Islamic Modern: Religious Courts and Cultural Politics in Malaysia. Princeton University Press, pp. 195–238.

16. Pew Research Center. (2023, September). Buddhism, Islam and religious pluralism in South and Southeast Asia. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2023/09/ pr_2023.09.12_se-asia_report.pdf

17. Malaysia Racism Report 2025 https://komas.org/download/Malaysia-Racism-Report-2025.pdf

18. Seraj, Z. (2025, October 18). Court rules parents can sue preacher Firdaus Wong over rights violations. New Straits Times. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nst.com.my/amp/news/ nation/2025/10/1297170/court-rules-parents-can-sue-preacher-firdaus-wong-over-rights

19. Malaysia 2025 USCIRF Annual Report https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/ Malaysia%202025%20USCIRF%20Annual%20Report.pdf

20. Yee, L. T., Elias, N., & Abdul Ghani, M. (2019). The religious conversion process of the Malaysian Chinese Muslim converts. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economic and Development (JISED), 4(23), 64–77. 309 E-ISSN:3070-8370