Статьи · Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026)

Development Of Global Communicative Motivation Among Medical Students: Theoretical Foundations And Practical Approaches

Authors

  • Shoira QORAVOYEVA

Keywords

communicative motivation communicative competence medical BY) license education professional orientation emotional intelligence doctor-patient (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/) communication Calgary-Cambridge model

Abstract

This article analyzes the theoretical and methodological foundations Published:09-06-2026 and practical factors for developing global communicative motivation among medical students. Communicative competence is substantiated as a core professional skill that directly affects clinical outcomes, with partnership- based communication, emotional intelligence, integration of humanities, and simulation-based training identified as key development factors. The Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. Submitted for open access publication findings confirm the need for a systematic pedagogical approach to building under the terms and conditions of the communicative motivation. Creative Commons Attribution (CC

References

1. Atamuratova, M. M. (2026). Improving the Methodology for Developing Pragmatic Competence in Teaching English to Students of Higher Medical Educational Institutions. PhD Dissertation Abstract. Termiz State University, Uzbekistan, n.p.

2. Professional Orientation and Learning Motivation among Students of Higher Medical Educational Institutions. (2023). Proceedings of the Republican Scientific and Practical Conference, n.p.

3. Silverman, J., Kurtz, S., & Draper, J. (2024). Skills for Communicating with Patients (4th ed.). CRC Press, pp. 14-18.

4. Berman, A. C., & Chutka, D. S. (2022). Assessing effective physician-patient communication skills: “Are you listening to me, doctor?”. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 34(1), 1–8.

5. Ha, J. F., & Longnecker, N. (2021). Doctor-patient communication: A review. Ochsner Journal, 21(3), 284–289.

6. World Health Organization. (2021). Global Competency and Outcomes Framework for Universal Health Coverage. Geneva: WHO.

7. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2023). Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Washington, DC.

8. General Medical Council. (2024). Outcomes for Graduates. London: GMC.

9. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. (2024). Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs.

10. Gordon, M., Patricio, M., Horne, L., et al. (2020). Developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 42(11), 1202–1215.

11. Cleland, J., McKimm, J., Fuller, R., Taylor, D., Janczukowicz, J., & Gibbs, T. (2020). Adapting to the impact of COVID-19: Sharing stories, sharing practice. Medical Teacher, 42(7), 772–775.

12. Chan, E., Jones, A., Wong, K., & Lee, M. (2022). Simulation-based communication training in undergraduate medical education: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 22, 486.

13. Bearman, M., Palermo, C., Allen, L., & Williams, B. (2019). Learning empathy through simulation: A systematic literature review. Simulation in Healthcare, 14(5), 308–319.

14. Hodges, B. D., & Kuper, A. (2019). Theory and practice in medical education: The role of communication and professionalism. Medical Education, 53(10), 960–968.

15. Zenodo Repository. (2024). Issues in Developing Communicative Activity among Medical Students. 314 E-ISSN:3070-8370