https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-9-0211; IMPROVING THE METHODOLOGY OF TEACHERS’

doi:10.57033/

Keywords

professional development higher education internationalization faculty competence intercultural communication pedagogical innovation technology-enhanced pedagogy reflective practice teacher training. 293 www.mijournals.com E-ISSN 3069-8375 Vol. 9 (Issue 2/2026)

Abstract

This study develops and evaluates an improved methodology for enhancing teachers’ professional competence in the context of higher education internationalization. As universities in Uzbekistan increasingly engage in international partnerships, joint programs, and English-medium instruction, faculty members face mounting pressure to transform their professional practice beyond traditional pedagogical approaches. A quasi-experimental design was employed with 96 faculty members from two universities: an experimental group (n=48) receiving a 16-week Integrated Professional Development Program (IPDP) comprising intercultural competence training, technology-enhanced pedagogy workshops, collaborative teaching practicums, and reflective portfolio development, and a control group (n=48) following conventional professional development activities. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured four competence dimensions: pedagogical innovation, intercultural communication, digital literacy, and reflective practice. Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the experimental group across all dimensions, with the largest effect observed in intercultural communication (t(94) = 5.83, p < 0.001, d = 1.19) and pedagogical innovation (t(94) = 4.97, p < 0.001, d = 1.02). Qualitative data from reflective portfolios and focus groups revealed that collaborative international teaching experiences and structured reflection were perceived as the most transformative components. These findings provide an empirically validated framework for faculty professional development in internationalizing higher education institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

2. Brunner, J. J., & Tillett, A. (2007). Higher education in Central Asia: The challenges of modernization. World Bank Publications. 300 www.mijournals.com E-ISSN 3069-8375 The Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies

3. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

4. Childress, L. K. (2010). The twenty-first century university: Developing faculty engagement in internationalization. Peter Lang.

5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

6. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

7. De Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2015). The future of internationalization of higher education in Europe. International Higher Education, (83), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2015.83.9073

8. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

9. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. Jossey- Bass.

10. Karimova, N. (2023). Integration of digital technologies in Uzbekistan’s higher education. Pedagogika va Psixologiya, (2), 54–70.

11. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260832

12. Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. Routledge.

13. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

14. Sharipov, Sh. (2021). Internationalization of higher education in Uzbekistan. Journal of Higher Education, (3), 28–42. 301 www.mijournals.com E-ISSN 3069-8375