International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities Research · Vol. 2 No. January Issue (2026)

"MUHOKAMAT UL-LUGHATAYN" AND ITS ROLE IN THE FORMATION OF TURKIC LANGUAGE THEORY

Authors

  • Erkin Ochilov Teacher of Native Language and Literature, Creative School named after Hamid Olimjon and Zulfiya
  • Hilola Mamarasulova Teacher of Native Language and Literature, Creative School named after Hamid Olimjon and Zulfiya

Keywords

Alisher Navoi Muhokamat ul-Lug’atayn Chagatai language Turkic linguistics; comparative linguistics Persian-Turkic bilingualism

Abstract

. This article examines Alisher Navoi's treatise "Muhokamat ul-Lug'atayn" ("Judgment of the Two Languages"), written in the late fifteenth century, as a foundational work in the theoretical study of the Turkic (Chagatai) literary language. The study analyzes Navoi's comparative methodology, his critique of the linguistic hierarchy that privileged Persian over Turkic in literary and official circles, and his systematic argumentation for the expressive and semantic superiority of the Turkic language. The article further explores the literary imagery employed in the treatise, particularly Navoi's discussion of youth and poetry, and situates the work within the broader intellectual tradition of Timurid Central Asia. Drawing on the original text and secondary scholarship, it is argued that "Muhokamat ul-Lug'atayn" represents not only a polemical defense of Turkic but also one of the earliest examples of systematic comparative linguistics in the Eastern scholarly tradition. The work continues to hold methodological relevance for contemporary Uzbek and Turkic linguistic studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abdurakhmonov, G. (1966). O'zbek tili tarixiy taraqqiyoti [Historical

development of the Uzbek language]. Tashkent: O’zbekiston, 230 p.

2. Bertels, E. E. (1965). Navoi i Jami [Navoi and Jami]. Moscow: Nauka, 302 p.

3. Braginsky, V. I. (2004). The System of Classical Eastern Literatures. London:

RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 128–165.

4. Eckmann, J. (1966). Chagatay Manual. Bloomington: Indiana University

Publications (Uralic and Altaic Series, Vol. 60), 340 p.

5. Kononov, A. N. (1958). Grammatika yazyka tyurkskikh rukopisey XIV–XV

vekov [Grammar of the Language of Turkic Manuscripts of the 14th–15th Centuries].

Leningrad: Nauka, 254 p.

6. Lentz, T. W., & Lowry, G. D. (1989). Timur and the Princely Vision: Persian

Art and Culture in the Fifteenth Century. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press,

pp. 55–80.

7. Navoi, A. (1989). Muhokamat ul-lug'atayn [Judgment of the Two Languages].

Tashkent: Sharq, 221 p.

8. Rustamov, A. (1986). Navoi va turkiy til masalalari [Navoi and questions of the

Turkic language]. O’zbekiston adabiyoti va san’ati, pp. 42–68.

9. Subtelny, M. E. (2007). Timurids in Transition: Turko-Persian Politics and

Acculturation in Medieval Iran. Leiden: Brill, pp. 95–130.

10. Yarshater, E. (Ed.). (1988). The Cambridge History of Iran: Vol. 6, The Timurid

and Safavid Periods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 913–958.