THE DISTINCTIVE APPROACH TO RATIONAL AND TRANSMITTED PROOFS IN MATURIDI THEOLOGY

Authors

  • Iqboljon QAMBAROV

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-6-0110

Keywords:

Maturidiyya, rational proof (aqlī dalil), transmitted proof (naqlī dalil), kalam, Ash’ariyya, Mu’tazila

Abstract

This article examines the distinctive approach of Maturidi theology to rational 
(aqlī) and transmitted (naqlī) proofs. The study begins by defining the key terms dalil (proof), 
naqlī dalil, and aqlī dalil and then comparatively situates the Maturidi school within the 
broader typology of methodological approaches to the knowledge of truth. The article traces 
the five-part classification of epistemological orientations formulated by Imam al-Ghazali, 
the three guiding principles of Ahl al-Sunna’s balanced method, and the specific position of 
the Maturidiyya as a school that grants wider scope to reason than the Ash’ariyya while 
maintaining the primacy of transmitted evidence over the Mu’tazila. The conclusion argues 
that the Maturidi synthesis of reason and revelation constitutes one of the most intellectually 
rigorous and practically relevant achievements of classical Islamic theology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Iqboljon QAMBAROV, Master’s Student (2nd Year), Specialisation in Islamic Theology, Philosophy, and Maturidi Studies, Tashkent Islamic Institute named after Imam al-Bukhari

    This article examines the distinctive approach of Maturidi theology to rational 
    (aqlī) and transmitted (naqlī) proofs. The study begins by defining the key terms dalil (proof), 
    naqlī dalil, and aqlī dalil and then comparatively situates the Maturidi school within the 
    broader typology of methodological approaches to the knowledge of truth. The article traces 
    the five-part classification of epistemological orientations formulated by Imam al-Ghazali, 
    the three guiding principles of Ahl al-Sunna’s balanced method, and the specific position of 
    the Maturidiyya as a school that grants wider scope to reason than the Ash’ariyya while 
    maintaining the primacy of transmitted evidence over the Mu’tazila. The conclusion argues 
    that the Maturidi synthesis of reason and revelation constitutes one of the most intellectually 
    rigorous and practically relevant achievements of classical Islamic theology.

References

1. Abd al-Rahim, A. (2024). Mashhur aqoid matnlari [Famous creed texts]. Shamsuddinxon

Boboxonov. (Original work in Uzbek).

2. al-Damanhuri, A. S. (2018). Naẓariyyat al-ma’rifa ‘inda ahl al-sunna wa-l-jama’a. Nur.

3. al-Farhawi, A. A. (2012). Nibras ‘ala sharḥ al-’aqa’id. Maktabat Yasin. (Original work

published 1433 AH).

4. al-Ghazali, A.H. (1993). Qanūn al-ta’wīl (M. Bijuw, Ed.). [Publisher not identified]. (Original

work published 1413 AH).

5. al-Khan, M.M.M. (2007). Al-qaṭ’ī wa-l-ẓannī fī l-thubūt wa-l-dalala ‹inda l-uṣūliyyīn. Dar

al-Kalim al-Ṭayyib. (Original work published 1428 AH).

6. Salim, A.M.A. (2024). Al-madrasa al-kalamiyya al-Maturīdiyya: dirasa taḥlīliyya fī l-manhaj

wa-l-madhhab. Dar al-Imam al-Razī.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Iqboljon QAMBAROV (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Open Access License and Copyright Terms

All articles published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation of the work in any medium or format, provided that the original author(s) and the source are properly credited.

Authors retain full copyright to their published work and grant the journal the right of first publication.

✅ Official license URL:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

How to Cite

THE DISTINCTIVE APPROACH TO RATIONAL AND TRANSMITTED PROOFS IN MATURIDI THEOLOGY. (2026). The Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-6-0110