TEACHING VOCABULARY THROUGH CONTEXT: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION IN EFL SETTINGS

Authors

  • Dilshoda UMAROVA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-9-0167

Keywords:

vocabulary teaching, context-based instruction, EFL, lexical competence, incidental learning, vocabulary retention

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of context-based vocabulary 
instruction compared to traditional decontextualized methods in English as a Foreign 
Language (EFL) classrooms. A quasi-experimental design was employed with 60 
intermediate-level university students divided into an experimental group (n=30) receiving 
vocabulary instruction through authentic reading contexts and a control group (n=30) 
taught via word-list memorization. Data were collected through pre-tests, immediate post-
tests, delayed post-tests administered four weeks after the intervention, and productive 
vocabulary tests. Results revealed that context-based instruction produced statistically 
significant improvements across all dimensions. The experimental group outperformed 
the control group on post-tests (t(58) = 4.87, p < 0.001, d = 1.26), demonstrated 34% 
superior long-term retention, and exhibited markedly higher productive vocabulary 
use. The findings support the integration of contextual approaches into EFL vocabulary 
curricula.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. 4th ed.

Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

2. Allan, D. (2004). Oxford Placement Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Baddeley, A. (1997). Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Rev. ed. Hove: Psychology DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09593989709036469

Press.

4. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681

Cambridge University Press.

5. Coady, J. and Huckin, T. (1997). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524643

Cambridge University Press.

6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale,

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

7. Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), pp. 213–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951

8. Craik, F. I. M. and Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X

Research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), pp. 671–684.

9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods

Approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

10. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

11. Durrant, P. and Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult Learners’ Retention of Collocations from Exposure. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349431

Second Language Research, 26(2), pp. 163–188.

12. Elgort, I. and Warren, P. (2014). L2 Vocabulary Learning from Reading: Explicit and Tacit

Lexical Knowledge. Language Learning, 64(2), pp. 365–414.

13. Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching. 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson.

14. Hasanova, D. and Shadieva, R. (2008). Implementing Communicative Language Teaching DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00215.x

in Uzbekistan. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), pp. 138–143.

15. Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and Incidental Second Language Vocabulary Learning.

In: Robinson, P. (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, pp. 258–286.

16. Mamatqulova, N. (2025). Kream strategiyasida kreativlikning o ‘rni va mohiyati. «ACTA

NUUz», 1(1.11. 1), 120-122.

17. Маматқулова, н. ф. (2020). Learner-centered Approach in Teaching English to Students

at Institutions Specialized in Language Teaching. Иностранные языки в Узбекистане,

(6), 92-103.

18. Mamatkulova, N. (2021). Learner-Centered Approach In Developing A Foreign Language

Lexical Competence. Philology Matters, 2021(2).

19. Mamatqulova, N. (2021, April). The Importance of Individual Approach in the Development

of Lexical Competencies in a Foreign Language. In Конференции.

20. Mamatkulova, N. (2025). Oliy ta’limda KREAM strategiyasi yordamida darslarni tashkil

etishning prinsiplari va usullari. The Lingua Spectrum, 4(1), 895-903.

21. Mamatkulova, N. (2025). Enhancing Students’ecolinguistic Awareness as a Key Educational

Priority in the 21st Century. Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan, 152-166.

22. Mamatkulova, N., & Nilufar, M. (2020). Independent study skills as a key to success in

higher education system. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational

Sciences, 8(10 Part II), 96-100.

23. Krashen, S. D. (1989). We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading. The Modern

Language Journal, 73(4), pp. 440–464.

24. Mamatqulova, N. (2025). Kream strategiyasida kreativlikning o ‘rni va mohiyati. «ACTA

NUUz», 1(1.11. 1), 120-122.

25. Laufer, B. and Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language:

The Construct of Task-Induced Involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp. 1–26.

26. Mackey, A. and Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design.

Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

27. Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 Vocabulary Learning from Context. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588216

645–670.

28. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759

University Press.

29. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How Large a Vocabulary is Needed for Reading and Listening? The DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59

Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), pp. 59–82.

30. Oxford, R. and Scarcella, R. C. (1994). Second Language Vocabulary Learning Among

Adults. System, 22(2), pp. 231–243.

31. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

32. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual. 6th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

33. Plonsky, L. and Oswald, F. L. (2014). How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079

Research. Language Learning, 64(4), pp. 878–912.

34. Prince, P. (1996). Second Language Vocabulary Learning: The Role of Context versus DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/329727

Translations. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), pp. 478–493.

35. Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942

36. Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532

3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

37. Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed Second Language Vocabulary Learning. Language Teaching DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921

Research, 12(3), pp. 329–363.

38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological

Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

39. Webb, S. (2007). The Effects of Repetition on Vocabulary Knowledge. Applied Linguistics, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml048

28(1), pp. 46–65.

40. Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.

41. Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Historical Trends in Second Language Vocabulary Instruction. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524643.003

In: Coady, J. and Huckin, T. (eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, pp. 5–19.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TEACHING VOCABULARY THROUGH CONTEXT: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION IN EFL SETTINGS. (2026). The Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-9-0167