Improving Public–Private Partnership Mechanisms For Infrastructure Development In The Regions: A Cross-Country Empirical Assessment With Evidence From Uzbekistan

Authors

  • Alisher BAYMIRZAEV

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-9-0273

Keywords:

public–private partnership, regional infrastructure, private participation in infrastructure, project aggregation, viability gap funding, contingent liabilities, sub- national finance, Uzbekistan. 605 www.mijournals.com E-ISSN 3069-8375 Vol. 2, (Issue 9/2026)

Abstract

Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are widely promoted as an instrument for closing regional infrastructure gaps in developing economies. This article asks whether the observed structure of global private infrastructure flows is compatible with that role. Using the World Bank Private Participation in Infrastructure database for 2024, merged with World Bank governance and national accounts data, a cross-section of 55 low- and middle-income economies is analysed by means of concentration measures, distributional statistics and ordinary least squares estimation with heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors. Three findings emerge. First, private infrastructure flows are extremely concentrated: the five largest recipients absorb 70.9 per cent of global commitments, and the Gini coefficient across recipients reaches 0.829. Second, flows are sectorally concentrated in large, revenue-generating national assets energy accounts for 67.5 per cent and information and communication technology for 10.4 per cent of commitments, while water, sanitation and municipal solid waste, the sectors that constitute regional and local infrastructure, together receive 1.6 per cent. Third, flows are lumpy: 36.4 per cent of recipient economies closed exactly one project in 2024 and the median recipient closed two, with a median project size of US$109 million. Regulatory quality does not explain flow intensity conditional on participation, but weaker regulatory environments are systematically associated with dependence on development-finance risk mitigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177–200.

2. Bennett, J., & Iossa, E. (2006). Building and managing facilities for public services. Journal of Public Economics, 90(10–11), 2143–2160.

3. Calderón, C., & Servén, L. (2004). The effects of infrastructure development on growth and income distribution (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3400). World Bank. 617 E-ISSN 3069-8375 Vol. 2, (Issue 9/2026)

4. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-158. (2023). “O‘zbekiston – 2030” strategiyasi to‘g‘risida [On the “Uzbekistan – 2030” Strategy]. Lex.uz.

5. Engel, E., Fischer, R., & Galetovic, A. (2013). The basic public finance of public–private partnerships. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(1), 83–111.

6. Engel, E., Fischer, R., & Galetovic, A. (2014). The economics of public–private partnerships: A basic guide. Cambridge University Press.

7. Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.

8. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge University Press.

9. Gramlich, E. M. (1994). Infrastructure investment: A review essay. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(3), 1176–1196.

10. Guasch, J. L. (2004). Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concessions: Doing it right. World Bank.

11. Guasch, J. L., Laffont, J.-J., & Straub, S. (2008). Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America: Evidence from the water and transport sectors. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(2), 421–442.

12. Hammami, M., Ruhashyankiko, J.-F., & Yehoue, E. B. (2006). Determinants of public–private partnerships in infrastructure (IMF Working Paper No. 06/99). International Monetary Fund.

13. Hart, O. (2003). Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public–private partnerships. The Economic Journal, 113(486), C69–C76.

14. Hart, O., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1127–1161.

15. Iossa, E., & Martimort, D. (2015). The simple microeconomics of public–private partnerships. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17(1), 4–48.

16. Irwin, T. C. (2007). Government guarantees: Allocating and valuing risk in privately financed infrastructure projects. World Bank.

17. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.

18. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. ZRU-537. (2019). Davlat-xususiy sheriklik to‘g‘risida [On public–private partnership]. Lex.uz.

19. Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224.

20. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

21. OECD. (2012). Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Public Governance of Public–Private Partnerships. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

22. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-308. (2024). O‘zbekiston Respublikasida 2024–2030-yillarda davlat-xususiy sheriklikni rivojlantirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida [On measures to develop public–private partnership in the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2024–2030]. Lex.uz. 618 E-ISSN 3069-8375 Vol. 2, (Issue 9/2026)

23. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209.

24. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.

25. World Bank. (2025a). Private participation in infrastructure (PPI): 2024 annual report [Data set and report]. World Bank.

26. World Bank. (2025b). Worldwide Governance Indicators: Regulatory quality [Data set]. World Bank.

27. Shermuxamedov, K., Karimov, J., & Najmiddinov, J. (2016). Diniy ekstremizm va terrorizmga qarshi kurashning ma’naviy-ma’rifiy asoslari: Usuv sullanma/-T. Toshkent:“Movarounnahr, 224.

28. Shermukhamedov, K. (2020). " THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD" RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL ORGANIZATION: PAST AND PRESENT.THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS RESEARCH Учредители: The USA Journals, 2(8), 65-71.

29. Shermuxamedov, K. (2017). Osujdeniye religioznogo fanatizma v islame. Rossiya i musulmanskiy mir, (2 (296)), 146-152.

30. Shermuxamedov, K. A. (2013). Osobennosti religiozno-ekstremistskix techeniy. In Sborniki konferensiy NIS Sosiosfera (No. 39, pp. 29-32). Vedecko vydavatelske centrum Sociosfera-CZ sro.

31. Shermukhamedov, K. A. (2014). Ideology of tolerance in Islam. Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defences of peace must be constructed, 159.

32. World Bank. (2025c). World development indicators [Data set]. World Bank. 619 E-ISSN 3069-8375

Downloads

Published

2026-09-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Improving Public–Private Partnership Mechanisms For Infrastructure Development In The Regions: A Cross-Country Empirical Assessment With Evidence From Uzbekistan. (2026). The Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies, 2(9), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-9-0273